I have corresponded with Tim Ricketts since the Course and this is his reply:

"I was quite careful with the code issue because there is a degree of differing interpretation nationally and I do remember saying "this is what we do" but you should take advice within your local area. Indeed I acknowledged that the process adopted in your neck of the woods is absolutely fine and correct. In Hurst, on the few occasions where it is necessary, we simply allow public participation ahead of an agenda item to enable councillors with prejudicial interests to speak nearer to the item rather than at the beginning of the meeting where the public part normally takes place. The councillor then has their say, perhaps fields questions from other councillors if they have important information to share, and then leaves the meeting. 

The specific issue you refer to was not raised yesterday. Had it been I would have added an extra caution as whenever finance is the issue, councillors must be very careful and ensure that they are not seen to influence the outcome of the debate."