MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE FINANCE COMMITTEE OF SEDLESCOMBE PARISH COUNCIL HELD ON TUESDAY 16 OCTOBER 2007 IN COMMITTEE ROOM 2 OF THE VILLAGE HALL, 19:30 TO 21:02
Present: Cllr P Glew (Chairman of the Committee), Cllrs Irwin & Dellow, Cllr V Wright (Chairman of the Council), Cllr A Rand (Vice-Chairman of the Council) [most of the meeting leaving at 20:45]. Clerk/Responsible Financial Officer - Mrs P J Raymond
***************************************
F07/08.14 Apology for absence was received from Cllr Martin (other engagement).
F07/08.15 Interests. In accordance with the Code of Conduct for Members adopted by the Council on 15/05/07, the following interests were declared:
|
F07/08.18.3 part
|
Cllr Rand
|
Personal/prejudicial interest
|
By virtue of his company carrying out work for the Council in connection with the portakabin at Sedlescombe Sportsfield
|
|
F07/08.23 part
|
All five councillors present
|
Personal/prejudicial interests |
By virtue of the Council being the sole Trustee of the Sedlescombe Public Playing Field & Recreation Ground Trust
Pursuant to a dispensation granted by the Standards Committee on 11/09/07, members are entitled to remain in the room, to speak and vote on matters relating to the Trust. |
In accordance with paragraph 12(2) of the adopted Code of Conduct, Cllr Rand was permitted to make a report to the Committee on the portakabin. He reported that the Council had reimbursed his Company for the same expenses that he had incurred in obtaining the portakabin for the Sportsfield. His Company had incurred costs relating to plumbing materials and timber from Stamco for partitioning. The electrics had been installed by a Rangers' parent foc and the water had been connected. Benches will be required and Cllr Glew will ask her husband if he is willing to make them. Cllr Rand is obtaining a price for a small kitchen to be installed in the portakabin.
F07/08.16 Public participation. No member of the public present.
F07/08.17 Minutes. The Chairman was authorised to sign the Minutes of the Meeting of the Finance Committee held on 28/08/07.
F07/08.18 Arising from the Minutes
|
Rother Community Fund |
£5,000 |
PJR |
|
Battle Partnership (for 2007/8 financial year) |
£2,000 |
PJR |
|
Sedlescombe Societies Association (from 2007 Fete) |
£1,000 |
RD |
|
Parish Council |
£20,000 |
|
|
Traditional Fayre on Green 22/09/07 and three donations |
£1,063 |
RD |
The following funding is in the pipeline:
|
Isabel Blackman Foundation |
£5,000 |
Passed first stage of application process |
|
Local Action Plan |
£2,000 |
Submitted for portakabin & demolition and clearance. Awaiting next meeting |
|
Police |
£500 |
Submitted, awaiting result |
|
Sports Association and other local fund-raising |
£20,000 |
Sports Association Ongoing. |
|
Football Foundation |
£142,500 |
Invited to workshop, 08/11/07, 11:15. Football Development Plan accepted, plans still to be amended to accord with Football Foundation requirements, Business Plan awaiting approval |
In addition, an application for £50,000 funding from the Lottery, Reaching Communities Fund has passed the first stage. The Committee agreed to wait for the result of the Football Foundation Workshop on 8 November before submitting the next stage form (must be submitted by 28/02/07).
F07/08.19 Audit of 2006/7 Parish Council Accounts. The audit of the 2006/7 accounts is now complete with both Internal and External Audits being carried out satisfactorily. Mrs Fisher no longer wishes to undertake the internal audit work and it will be necessary, therefore, to find a replacement for next year's accounts. It was agreed that the RFO should obtain some quotations to bring to the next meeting of the Finance Committee for consideration.
A new requirement for the audit of the 2006/7 accounts was a "Review of Effectiveness of the System of Internal Audit of the Accounts". Committee members had been provided with the RFO's Review dated 05/10/07 and agreed to accept the amendments to the current practice as specified in 1b and f. RESOLVED: That the RFO's Review of the effectiveness of the system of internal audit of the 2006/7 accounts is accepted.
F07/08.20 Review of Half-Yearly Statement of Accounts at 30/09/07. The Committee considered the following statement comparing the Actual income & expenditure April-September 2007 against the orginal budget:
|
Income
|
Budget Apr-Mar 2007-8
|
Actual Apr-Sept 2007-8
|
|
Precept
|
28270
|
28270
|
|
Sales
|
495
|
88
|
|
Interest
|
1725
|
2009
|
|
Income from rents
|
2
|
0
|
|
Agency services
|
275
|
285
|
|
Online submission refund
|
0
|
0
|
|
Grant income (including fund-raising
|
0
|
943
|
|
Playing field income
|
0
|
0
|
|
Total Income
|
30767
|
31595
|
|
Expenditure
|
||
|
Administration
|
7797
|
3733
|
|
Clerk's Salary/National Insurance
|
14320
|
7145
|
|
Village security
|
500
|
0
|
|
Grants awarded to other bodies
|
500
|
25
|
|
Sportsfield from fund
|
18165
|
2789
|
|
Agency services
|
200
|
88
|
|
Amenities
|
8507
|
1696
|
|
Playing field expenditure
|
3800
|
785
|
|
Total expenditure
|
53789
|
16261
|
|
SUMMARY
|
||
|
Brought forward
|
65028
|
65028
|
|
Income
|
30767
|
31595
|
|
Expenditure
|
-53789
|
-16261
|
|
Total
|
42006
|
80362
|
|
REPRESENTED BY
|
||
|
General funds
|
2186
|
23623
|
|
Unspecified youth work
|
1300
|
0
|
|
Village Security Fund
|
7000
|
7500
|
|
Sportsfield Fund
|
0
|
17719
|
|
Clerk's Gratuity Fund
|
26520
|
26520
|
|
Tennis Courts Fund
|
5000
|
5000
|
|
Total divided between funds
|
42006
|
80362
|
The RFO answered a question about the brought forward figure of £65,028 and referred the Committee to details contained in the Audited 2006/7 column of the summary on page 8 of the 2008-9 Budget Preparations document. Members discussed the Village Security Fund which the Internal Auditor had queried and agreed to wait until after the special meeting of the Crime & Safety Committee and Inspector Keating of Sussex Police had taken place on 19/10/07. Cllr Dellow reported that there is some money (£100+) left from the last financial year in the special PCSO overtime pot which the Parish Council had paid into.
F07/08.21 Initial Consideration of Autumn 2007 Residents' Parish Plan Consultation Results. The RFO reported that the closing date for return of forms was the previous day. Forms had been delivered to all 675 households in the parish in September. The result was a very poor 6.2% response (42 forms). However, lots of comments had been made on a wide range of topics and these would be considered at the next Council Meeting in November. From the Finance Committee' viewpoint, it was noted that 33 of the respondents wished the Parish Council to carry out a further Parish Plan consultation exercise in the parish. If agreed, this would result in increased costs for the budget either this year and/or next. It was also noted that although many of the comments would not involve the Parish Council in spending money, work such as installation of a footway in Sandrock Hill would. Currently, the Parish Council does not have the powers to spend more than allowed by the Free Resource, but the Government is expected to bring in the "power of well-being" for Quality Councils soon which will allow the Parish Council to spend without limit as it thinks fit (of course raised through the Council Tax).
F07/08.22 Grant aid to other bodies. The Committee noted that only £25 had so far been spent from the £500 Grant Aid to Other Bodies budget head. An application for funding from The Rural Rother Trust had been received and approved by the Parish Council. The amount had been left to the Finance Committee after it had had sight of the accounts for last year. The accounts are now to hand and it was noted that four grants were made last year including one of £400 to Battle Guides. The Committee, whilst being pleased to support genuine need, especially in Sedlescombe, did not feel that the Parish Council should support Battle Guides. However, it was RESOLVED: That in accordance with the Council's powers under sections 137 and 139 of the Local Government Act 1972, a donation of £50 should be made to the Rural Rother Trust in 2007/8. This expenditure is in the interests of the area or its inhabitants and will benefit them in a manner commensurate with the expenditure.
This leaves £425 under this budget head for the year. It was noted that the Churchyard Fund had not yet submitted an application for grant aid although was expected to do so in the near future.
F07/08.23 Parish Council Finances 2007-8 and 2008-9. Members had been provided with a document prepared by the RFO entitled 2008-9 Budget Preparations. The Committee considered the Briefing Notes that accompanied it and the following decisions were made:
F07/08.24 De La Warr Pavilion Charitable Trust. Rother District Council had provided parish councils with a briefing paper on Rother's financial involvement with the Trust which has amounted to £500,000 p.a. for the last five years. A consultation exercise is being undertaken. The following would be passed to Rother:
For the following reasons, the Parish Council suggests that the De La Warr Pavilion is not supported by a district-wide rate but, because of the advantages that have been highlighted in the report "Creative Impact", it is supported through the Bexhill Council Tax. This is another reason why Bexhill should be parished.
The De La Warr is remote from Sedlescombe - a visit involves a 25-mile round trip.
There is no public transport between Sedlescombe and Bexhill and Sedlescombe's older population (a third of the total) often relies on buses to reach destinations.
Other theatres such as the White Rock in Hastings are closer and on a bus route.
The secondary spend impact, which is important to Bexhill, has little impact on the rural economy as far away as Sedlescombe.
Bexhill is not the town of choice for Sedlescombe's residents to visit.
Regeneration of Bexhill, which is sometimes linked to the De La Warr, has no impact on the rural area of Sedlescombe.
Consultants place emphasis on offering opportunities to the younger sector of Bexhill's population. If Sedlescombe's youngers were interested in attending events, they would have difficulty reaching them.
Chairman...................................................... Date................................................................